Judge Slashes Musk's Tesla Pay Again: Will Lawyers Now Run Delaware Companies? 

Judge Slams Musk's Tesla Pay, Again: Are Shareholders Powerless?

A Delaware judge has once again rejected Elon Musk's massive Tesla compensation package, sparking a debate about shareholder rights versus judicial oversight. Tesla claims this decision puts judges and lawyers in control of Delaware corporations, disenfranchising shareholders who overwhelmingly approved the package. Is this judicial overreach, or is it necessary to protect shareholder interests from potentially self-serving deals? Where do we draw the line between shareholder democracy and the court's role in ensuring corporate fairness? Does this ruling set a dangerous precedent, or is it a vital check on executive power? This judge has a history of strong corporate governance decisions. Is this pattern indicative of a bias against powerful figures like Musk, or is she simply upholding the law? Share your thoughts on this complex issue and what it means for the future of corporate governance.