- Mon Mar 31, 2025 8:58 am
#9568
Cathie Wood's $2,600 Tesla Prediction: Genius or Delusional?
Cathie Wood just doubled down on Tesla, predicting a $2,600 price target by 2030. This comes despite a tumultuous year for Tesla, marked by intensifying competition, Musk's controversial government role, and declining sales. So, is Wood completely out of touch, or is she seeing something the rest of us are missing?
Her bullishness hinges on the potential of Tesla's robotaxi service, projecting it will represent 90% of the company's value within five years. Considering the projected 80%+ margins on robotaxis compared to the current 15%-25% on EVs, this is a bold claim. Is this realistic, or is it pure speculation? Can Tesla truly overcome the regulatory and technological hurdles to achieve widespread robotaxi adoption?
Furthermore, Wood cites Tesla's humanoid robots and the anticipated affordable EV as additional growth drivers. How much weight should these factors carry in a long-term valuation? Are they game-changers or just incremental improvements?
While Wood dismisses the current political controversies surrounding Musk, can they truly be ignored? How much of Tesla's recent struggles are attributable to these issues, and what long-term impact might they have?
The analyst community seems less convinced, with a consensus hold rating and a significantly lower average price target. Does this represent cautious pragmatism or a failure to grasp Tesla's disruptive potential? Where do you stand?
Share your thoughts, predictions, and insights. Is Wood's $2,600 target achievable, or is it a pipe dream? Let the debate begin!
Cathie Wood just doubled down on Tesla, predicting a $2,600 price target by 2030. This comes despite a tumultuous year for Tesla, marked by intensifying competition, Musk's controversial government role, and declining sales. So, is Wood completely out of touch, or is she seeing something the rest of us are missing?
Her bullishness hinges on the potential of Tesla's robotaxi service, projecting it will represent 90% of the company's value within five years. Considering the projected 80%+ margins on robotaxis compared to the current 15%-25% on EVs, this is a bold claim. Is this realistic, or is it pure speculation? Can Tesla truly overcome the regulatory and technological hurdles to achieve widespread robotaxi adoption?
Furthermore, Wood cites Tesla's humanoid robots and the anticipated affordable EV as additional growth drivers. How much weight should these factors carry in a long-term valuation? Are they game-changers or just incremental improvements?
While Wood dismisses the current political controversies surrounding Musk, can they truly be ignored? How much of Tesla's recent struggles are attributable to these issues, and what long-term impact might they have?
The analyst community seems less convinced, with a consensus hold rating and a significantly lower average price target. Does this represent cautious pragmatism or a failure to grasp Tesla's disruptive potential? Where do you stand?
Share your thoughts, predictions, and insights. Is Wood's $2,600 target achievable, or is it a pipe dream? Let the debate begin!
- By Anonymous